I usually write on topics that apply mostly to used panty buyers but this new report is important for girls that want to sell panties online and are looking for free advice on how to sell used panties online. I have learned that a new advice site has opened called Used Panty Selling Advice at usedpantysellingadvice.com . What's the problem? Plenty I'm afraid.
A peek at the whois for the site shows the person who owns and runs it is no other than "Amber Fellows" the stage name of the person who runs laceinyourface.com and countless other websites, blogs, Twitter accounts, and hate/spam rags. Most who have read my blog over the years will remember that name with not so fond memories. She hasn't been around much lately but for a time was selling on all the panty sites a few years ago until she disappeared. Is she a panty seller new panty sellers should look to for advice? You be the judge.
According to information provided on the web, "Amber" was barred from selling on Panty Hog and MyUsedPantyStore due to buyer complaints around 2008 and her feedback history on ebanned shows that ebanned finally shut her down in August of 2009.
Here is the real ugly kicker. According to "Amber Fellow"'s own posts on her blog, she was a long time member of Panty Trust at some point and Panty Trust ended up revoking her seal and membership. What this actually means is that 300 Panty Trust members, her fellow used panty sellers, voted to revoke her Panty Trust membership. 300 of your "sisters" voting to boot you out of the house seems to suggest that they clearly found some pretty damning evidence against her being an ethical panty seller that provides good customer service.
Forward a couple of years later and this person banned from selling panties on sites all over the panty community is now going to give advice to new panty sellers? Once again, something stinks in pantyland. While we watch and see exactly what kind of scheme this person is running, buyers are warned to proceed with caution. The last thing we panty buyers needed was a school where tricks and cons that panty sellers can use to ripoff buyers are taught. The panty selling venues and 300 of the web's most established and trusted sellers don't come together and demand that a fellow seller be banned without a very good reason. For the safety of our hard earned money, we need to assume the worst here.
nice blog and interesting revelations
ReplyDeletei've never heard of mypanty store but I have been selling on ebanned for 9 months. this AMBER is very good at getting on other sellers shitlists ahahaha she hasn't sold jiz on ebanned because she takes her sales to her website to avoid the fees everyone knows but dont say anything cos need no more DRAMA then there already is with her!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
do not buy ANYTHING on ebanned.
ReplyDeleteI was scammed there and lost money :(
Transparency on this site obviously has its limits...
ReplyDeleteNo matter where you go on the internet you run into trolls trying to scam people and trying to keep others from having a good time. Ignore this amber. Karma has a way nice way of naturally taking care of the haters and scammers.
DeleteGood advice for panty lovers Mark. If a panty seller has to try and convince you that she is transparent and honest and genuine by posting so on every page of her website it should be a red flag that she is none of them. Rich people don't talk about how rich they are. Successful people don't tell you how successful they are. Honest people and businesses don't need to try and convince you that what your gut tells you is wrong. Just sayin.
laceinyourface amber is a HATER
Deleteshe throws her weight around on the internet and talks behind everyone's backs, even if she makes no sense ah ah
she tried to befriend me only so that she could bitch about this panty trust seller and no other reason, she tells u she is "HELPING" sellers but its all horseshit, she is in for herself and her sales
its funny, i thought she was genuine too, but i know other sellers who know better and i got warned on time
KittyKatty
Thanks for the info. Hate to read about a panty trust member going bad like this but props to the panty trust girls for doing the right thing and voting to kick Amber out of their group. Hopefully she wasn't a member too long.
ReplyDeleteThis post needs an update Joe. Since the time of your post, this story has gone from one of a disgraced panty seller stealing money from a few buyers and teaching others to do it too, to a fascinating, real-time case study of how the powerful tools available on today's Internet have worked to exacerbate one woman's spiral into a deep psychosis.
ReplyDeleteWhile she was a member of Panty Trust, Amber helped write the very rules that she was voted out for breaching. Sure, her disgrace of doing the walk of shame out Panty Trust in front of her sister members and the negative feedback from buyers on selling sites took away her ability to fleece men of their cash through shady panty deals, but what ended up being more important is that this event threw her into a heightened sense of powerlessness in her life.
Having learned her lesson in the group of equals managerial culture of Panty Trust, Amber has since started her own version of a third party verification service. Only this time, she has set it so that she is the sole governing member giving her unchallenged, complete and utter control over the online lives of the panty sellers that she is able to snare in her web. No longer can her power be threatened by equals in the group leaving her free to seek even more opportunities for a high from feelings of power.
Consider the notoriously toxic troll Amber has become and the level of effort required to spend years tracking and data-mining other panty sellers or mounting an endless series of intensive blog, denial of service, Twitter, and Google bombing campaigns designed to destroy all other panty sellers which she considers her enemies.
Forgiveness and redemption seem to be alien concepts for Amber, which implies a deep psychological need is being addressed.
What exactly is going on?
A recent article in The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/21530945 describing how “quite ordinary people will succumb to bad behaviour if the circumstances are right” may hold some answers.
According to the article, Nathanael Fast of the University of Southern California and colleagues at Northwestern and Stanford universities ran a series of experiments to see if social circumstances around power and status have the potential to create “little Hitlers” who annoy and frustrate others for their own gratification - or are certain individuals predisposed to this sort of behaviour simply gravitating into situations where they can behave badly?
The experiments randomly placed participants into one of 4 groups: high power/high status, low power/low status, low power/high status, and high power/low status. Participants were given the option of forcing other participants to perform humiliating actions -- or not.
Those in the low status/high power group chose significantly more demeaning tasks to impose onto other participants, while those in the other 3 groups did not exhibit this behaviour.
Does this mean perhaps that Amber is in a position of low status in real life and is compensating by harassing and attempting to humiliate those within her reach?
If, as the study suggests, the combination of low status and high power is a recipe for trouble, I am beginning to think the celebrated free social media tools which empower those dedicated to cultivating their Internet notoriety may contain the seeds of their own destruction as the "little Hitlers" of the social media use their online power to trash everyone else.